|
Author
|
Topic: Lyon Opera Ballet vs PNB
|
|
|
<HKG>
unregistered
|
posted 09-25-2004 08:42 PM
Re: PNB's The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Mr. Demetre is WAY off base. Although he finds it entertaining to hammer away at Kent Stowell's choreography any chance he gets (hopefully he won't get another in the P.I. soon)his attitude vs. gets in the way of his eyeballs w/R & J. Some acquintance with Balanchine ballets does not a critc make. Read other reviews.This production was designed to be pared down to the relationship of the lovers - hence no overwhelming Prokovief score, no crowds of 50 dancers milling around and no "look at me - I'm the star of the show" leads. The balcony and bedroom pas de duex are among the finest in story-ballet canon - not sure where Mr. Demetre was looking, but about the only time they stopped dancing was to kiss - a hard thing to do on the run and never as effective. It is an intimate rendering of Romeo and Juliet, yes - in numbers and concept. If you want 75+ dancers doing endless variations and chewing up the scenery, hang tight for the Bolshoi. And don't ever expect a favorable review of a Stowell ballet from this source -Mr. Demetre is deaf, dumb and blind to the evidence. HKG
IP: Logged
|
|
<Jim Demetre>
unregistered
|
posted 09-26-2004 03:51 PM
Dear HKG,Kent and Francia should be commended for creating one of the country's great ballet companies (and ballet schools) here in Seattle. To me, this is one of the most significant achievements in Seattle's cultural history. Although I am not a fan of R & J, I have been a subscriber to the PNB for over ten years and have spent many evenings enjoying his work. I am very much looking forward to "Silver Lining." If I am asked to write about this for the P-I, you will understand that - however "deaf, dumb and blind" I may be - I do not dismiss Kent Stowell's work out of hand. Thanks for writing in with your opinion!
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Ljiljana
Cafe guest
Member # 429
Member Rated:
|
posted 09-27-2004 02:47 PM
I have to agree with Demetre. I saw the production as well and it was a mediocre theater going experience. I like how HKG (what's your real name?) feels that Demetre is not qualified to review dance and elaborates on all the things the audience ought to understand about the production. It's interesting, however, to wonder whether a reader should spend approximately $100 on tickets to view this thing. The answer is decidedly no. If you want to be high brow about it I would say there is no classical catharsis that the best in theater offers the audience. I did not walk out wobbling with insight having touched the sublime. On a low brow note, it was just plain boring. The music not Tchaikovsky's best, the choreography more voguing than dancing --nobody wants two hours of that, and R & J the least passionate couple since Pat and Dick Nixon. Given that the youthful passion of R & J is the lifeblood of the story that's a big miss. As pretty as the sets and costumes were, there was nothing of the spice of life in the piece save for the duel between Mercutio and Thybalt and thank god for those two, they packed more zing into the piece than twenty Romeos could have. Even the feud between the two families seemed more like a misunderstanding between diplomats from Switzerland and, say, Costa Rica, not the stuff of great art. So what we have is a work that only operates on the middlebrow level, people who know they should know about the play and the ballet and the music have satisfied themselves with the knowledge that they have in fact seen some representation of this story, but nothing more. Should we be settling for that? Hell no. -------------------- Ljiljana That's not how gay works... official motto of 2008
Posts: 172 | From: Seattle | Registered: May 2004 | IP: Logged
|
|
Jim Demetre
Cafe guest
Member # 363
Member Rated:
|
posted 09-28-2004 10:39 AM
I felt some need to talk more about Kent Stowell and the PNB, so here I go.I was not expecting to enjoy the Bolshoi's old Soviet "Romeo & Juliet" with its choreography by Grigorovich. When it was over, however, I found myself trembling. This did not happen when I saw Kent Stowell's version last Thursday. It is important for me to note that Stowell has produced full-length narrative ballets that have great emotional intensity. Both "Swan Lake" and the "Nutcracker" succeed at this because the themes of sexuality and the dawning of adulthood (both present in "R&J") are treated in the context of mythology rather than social parable. Stowell is more of a German Romantic than Shakespearean Tragedian. And German Romanticism is better-suited to ballet anyhow. I also wanted to address my comments regarding the Lyon Opera Ballet's production of "Jardi Tancat." I suggest that the Balanchine-honed "precision" of the PNB dancers may have diminished the soulfulness of this work, but I have seen it greatly enhance other pieces such as Paul Taylor's "Company B." The Paul Taylor Company's version simply does not compare. The PNB gives it a satiric edge Tayor may have desired but his company could never achieve. -------------------- Jim Demetre Artdish Editor
Posts: 2606 | From: Seattle | Registered: Nov 2003 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|